Moon hoax not - bestofyoutube.com

Like he says at 11:45 - "Once you're forced to hypothesize whole new technologies to keep your conspiracy possible, you've stepped over into the realm of magic." Just face it, the moon landings were real.

Baguette (guest) - 11 years ago

2
up

I think you missed the point. If you say that nasa didn't have advanced technology to send a man on the moon, you can't postulate the use of advanced technology to produce the hoax. It's just non-sense...

Guest (guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

^ Yeah, because our 1,458,219 active military are somehow amazingly good at keeping secrets.

Reply to this post:

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

I'm not saying the Moon landings weren't real. But the guy in the video is making wrong assumptions. Maybe he didn't know how to fake the Moon landings at the 60s but I'm pretty sure there were technologies beyond his knowlidge. And I think it would have been a lot easier to fake the films than actually travel to the Moon with all the radiation and other hazardious obstacles. But maybe they really did go, who knows ;) And you really think 1,458,219 active military knows about every secret military operation?

1
down

Reply to this post:

Realist (guest) - 11 years ago

2
up

I don't see how he is making the wrong assumptions. They're NASA, not god. You really think they would get an order from the president: "Hello, we want you to FAKE going to the moon. With no background knowledge of the movie industry, you have a couple of years to come up with the new technology needed. We hope you astrophysicists find this assignment interesting since it is about space-stuff (sort of) and that everyone involved will keep their mouth shut until the end of time." It's just ridiculous to think that this technology would have been there and not used for other stuff.

heftygrain - 11 years ago

He did hint that it would be pretty hard to make a 5300 ft film without leaving film artifacts that would give the hoax away, didn't he?

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

So if it is hard it is impossible? Like if the Moon landings were hard they were impossible?

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

I have thought about that myself as well! Like why not return to the Moon or better yet to make a manned mission to Mars? ;) Good thing Kubrick was around with the Space Odyssey 2001 experience, haha.

Reply to this post:

(guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

He says he's not sure if men went to the moon, but he says he's sure they could not have faked it, so HE IS sure men went to the moon?!

Reply to this post:

(guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

high speed cameras did exist... ever see the bullet through the apple? Regardless, we went to the moon.

1
down

Reply to this post:

Baguette (guest) - 11 years ago

He is talking about high speed video, not high speed camera using film...

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

Something like this you mean? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqW6k_sQS3A

(guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

Compile this video with what is for me the biggest proof that they DID land on the moon; the fact that Russia, the USA's fiercest rivals in the space race had their satellites pointed at the moon awaiting transmissions.....Russia never ever came out and said America faked the moon landings. If Russia suspected they didn't, they would have said. But they didn't say anything because men really did land on the moon in 1969. Deal with it.

Reply to this post:

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

It was very well possible at the time to bounce radio and laser signals from the Moon. So maybe Russia didn't honestly know. Or if they did maybe they had other reasons not to come forward. It's not a definitive proof men did go to the Moon I'm afraid.

(guest) - 11 years ago

There's more evidence that supports that men actually did land on the moon then that they faked it. Watch the video again and you get a brief summary of why those "fake photo" ideas are wrong. Mythbusters proved all those photo, light, footprint and wind theories wrong too. This video shows how difficult it would be actually film the fake in 1969. Russia said absolutely nothing. And we know that men have been to the moon in the later missions because they left reflectors on the moon so that we can point lasers at the reflectors from earth to measure the distance. So if they went to the moon in the later missions, do you think they could have just gone to the moon with Apollo 11? But some people will just flat out refuse to believe it at all, and whenever answers are given to their theories, they simply keep making up new ideas to keep the theory alive. So there's no point debating this. Believe what you want

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

Actually there is at least as much evidence that men did't land on the Moon. Mythbusters have been known to be wrong before. This is a nice video which shows how they shot high-speed videos in the sixties. So the only problem according to the original video here is the length. Oh my, I'm sure there was no way of creating a huge film reel in 1960s, no way! It was something what was unimaginable at the time! But like the last poster said, people will just flat out refuse to believe it all... ;) I think we shouldn't debate whether men walked on the Moon here but whether the video is correct. And to me it seems naive.

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

Oops forgot to post the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBV0DED7RYA

Me (guest) - 11 years ago

@Propagandist: You are still clinging on while ALL other "evidence" has been disproven. Now you're saying the moon landings were fake, because you claim it was POSSIBLE to shoot high speed footage? Well, get this: It WAS NOT possible to shoot live action footage in a format that would air on television without interference for hours and hours on end, especially not high-speed footage. Do you understand it yet? There is no way in HELL this technology was there in secret. You're just another retard arguing for the sake of arguing.

Me (guest) - 11 years ago

It's as if saying "There's no proof of the country of Bulgaria existing." "Uhh, yes there is." "Have you been there?" "No, but.." "Then you can't know." "Well, my friend was there.." "Your friend might be lying." "Well, it's there on every map and satellite picture." "They could be fake." "What about the people living in Bulgaria?" "They could technically have been lied to by their government and live in Romania instead." "Omfg, are you retarded?" "No, see, resorting to namecalling, I win discussion, there is no proof of Bulgaria existing!" So please shut the fuck up, people went to the moon, deal with it.

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

@Me: If you read what I've said, you know that I'm not saying the Moon landings didn't happen. I'm only saying that this video is incorrect. There was actually technology available to shoot and display high-speed video in the 60s. Even extended durations.

uhh, no (guest) - 11 years ago

No. There wasn't. End of story, keep living in your imaginary land where you can just make stuff up and it becomes real. You have to learn to separate imagination from fact.

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago

Okay, I'll try to do just that ;)

defrenchguy - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

The CRAZIES are out!!!

Reply to this post:

McFly (guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]

They could have built a time machine, gone to the future and brought back the technology to produce the fake broadcasts. Maybe...

Reply to this post:

Propagandist (guest) - 11 years ago [ Reply ]